The question was asked about different ways to scale your trim rings.
I don't always do it but this is how I do it - when I do it.
First, the theory: I use the cue's diameter at the trim ring locations
to determine the proportions. For example, in the picture below, I
show the different diameters at the joint, both ends of the wrap and
above the buttcap.
In the interests of keeping costs down, although 4 different sizes are
called for, the same size
can be used at both ends of the
buttsleeve. Since you have to make a new billet for each size, 3
billets is more economical than 4. Of course, the trim used at the
joint will also be used on the shafts & JPs.
The picture below shows the calculations for each location for
reference.
The calculations are pretty simple.
First, determine the ratio between the different trim locations and the
size you want at the joint. For example, the diameter at the "A" joint
trim is 1.024". If you divide this by .855", the diameter of the joint
trim, you get a scale factor of 1.199.
Second, multiply the joint segment width of .125" by the scale factor of
1.199 and you get .150". This will be the width of the "A" joint trim
segment.
Do this at each trim location to get accurately proportioned segment
sizes. The calculations below each segment in the picture simply
show the ratio between the segment size & the space between the
segments. As expected, the ratio of .601/.602 is the same for each
location, proving that they have the same proportions.
The thickness of each trim ring can be determined the same way.
Below is a cue in which the chain links are perfectly proportioned at
each end of the cocobolo handle.